"I agree with you that nullification is absolutely constitutional. Where most people go wrong on this issue is the fact that they've been educated into believing that the U.S. was created to be a consolidated nation-state, rather than a "confederated republic," as the Founders referred to it. Unfortunately, many see no reason to question that view, so they never investigate the matter for themselves."
—Robert F. Hawes, Jr.
     author of Nullification Revisited and One Nation Indivisible? A Study of Secession and the Constitution

"I would like to congratulate you on your brilliant, iconoclastic, and illuminating research."[on Volume II]
—Dr. Arthur Scherr
     Assistant Professor of History, City University of New York

"Volume Two is splendid. Beautifully written and with learning unsurpassed in our generation."
—Dr. Clyde N. Wilson
     Professor of History, University of South Carolina

"I look forward to continue learning from you. May God continue to bless you in your new life of retirement from academia. Please don't retire from writing for America's sake."
—Andrew Nappi
     FLorida Tenth Amendment Center, TAMPA, FLORIDA

"Elected officials, Wood contends, have strayed far from the intentions of the founders and that the historical record from the early days of the republic proves that 'government should be very limited.' "
—The Virginian-Pilot
     Hampton Roads, Virginia

"I don't always agree, but you build a forceful case that deserves wide dissemination and serious consideration. Publication of the magnum version of your work is therefore a welcomed event for all of us."
—Dr. Robert Weir
     Professor of History, University of South Carolina (retired)

"I mentioned your book(s) in mine as a book they don't want you to read. Excellent and useful work."
—Dr. Brion McClanahan
     Author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers